Crouser & Associates Performance Group program helps printers prosper through
on-site assistance and twice yearly group meetings. For more information by Email or call (304) 342-5100. Crouser Report OnLine is the Copyright Thomas P. Crouser. Material may not be reproduced in whole or in part without written consent. Current reports are on the WWW at http://www.printusa.com.

Independent To Franchise? Opinions Part III

Crouser Report OnLine March 13, 1996

Transmitted from Orlando, Florida

Tom Crouser presents Power Pricing in NEW ORLEANS on Saturday, March 23rd for the Gulf Coast Association of Quick Printers. For meeting information, message Gator4Fun@aol.com. Visitations: two on-site visitation dates are available in the south in April along with one in Colorado in May. Other appointments are being accepted for September and later. Reply to me for more details.

In this edition of the independent to franchise question, I offer four letters from you on the subject as well as my own opinion. Here s the latest: From: Hotline Cy
To: TomCrouser


You write: Our purchase of a Xerox 5065 was a disaster. I am still fighting with Xerox. 6. With a major franchise, maybe Xerox will pay more attention. Besides they can make a more attractive pricing deal with the major companies.

As I started reading this newsletter I couldn t wait to offer my response. However by the time I had completed reading it virtually everything I wanted to say had been said. I will limit my response to two areas. First, next to my outsourcing software my Xerox 5065 (and later 5365) were the absolute best single item investments I have made since I entered the printing business. The Xerox was my first mid-range copier, was reasonably reliable, was superbly serviced by Xerox, and moved almost 40% of the B/W 8.5-11x17 work off my Ryobi 3200.

As for the second area - I fully concur that NAQP (and intercourse with other members) is an excellent and economically feasible alternative to franchise affiliation in most cases. An independent of five or so years who elects to affiliate with a franchise would appear to have not taken advantage of the other resources that were available to him. I would think that one could buy a lot of John Stewart s or Tom Crouser s time for the initial franchise fee and John and Tom don t require a monthly percentage of your gross for as long as you are in business.

Very good input from your followers. Sorry I couldn t get to Dallas for your confab. Glad to hear it went well. (Joe) Polonko is a heavyweight and the best thing that has happened to Texas printers in many years. cy Subj: Franchise, NOT!
From: JeroldS1
To: TomCrouser


As a former franchise owner, there is not much I could say on the positive side, so don t ask. One thing that I think is important are amount of new store sales and resale of existing stores. Also average amount of years in business in both cases. Jerold S1 Subj: Franchises
From: JeffAtGPA
To: TomCrouser


In talking about support available from franchises, none of your responders mentioned one option - Tom Crouser! Most of the things your prospective franchisee is looking for are benefits gained by joining one of your performance groups (although I don t think your name recognition helps with our customers).

You, Pamela and the other members of our performance group have helped us to hire and train people, to get our accounting in order (some day it will happen), to buy effectively, and much of the other services he is looking for. The networking opportunities in a performance group are tremendous, and I know the seven other printers in the group are more than willing to help me out with advice. The performance group system isn t cheap, but it s a bargain compared to franchises! Subj: Independent vs. Franchise
From: Bpcf
To: TomCrouser


Dear Tom, Now that I m back from the NAQP Owner s Conference full on new ideas and beads, I have a few thoughts regarding the Chicago shop owner who is considering a switch to join a franchise. Since we are not a franchise shop, only know what I hear from other shop owners - both franchise & independent owners. Some franchise owners get more help than others, but most of the responsibility still rest with the owner who cannot be passive and expect the answers to come from others. There is no simple recipe or formula to follow. If there were we d all be rich.

If a shop had say, $400,000.00 in sales per year, then $20,000 to $40,000 would have to go to the franchise for royalties. Imagine what a shop owner could do with that kind of money. You could belong to several printing associations like NAQP, Chicagoland Chapter of NAQP, NAPL, etc. plus attend their programs as well as bring your employees to the programs. You could have even gone to New Orleans for 4 days and attend some great seminars, network with other printers, eat some fantastic food, and catch a few beads.

The NAQP seminars on hiring and motivating employees were pack with valuable information and hand-outs. The sessions were also taped, in case one could not attend or would want to review the information.

Among the valuable information I learned while networking with other printers:
  1. A group of Denver lawyers have started a class-action suit against Xerox regarding the 5065. I intend for find out if I can offer any helpful information.
  2. Although we had Xerox switch out our 5065, it is still running into the same problems as our other machine. These problems are indicative of the model and others have the same problems.
  3. I got some valuable information about pricing desk-top publishing jobs and how to market design work.
  4. One of the winning ideas in the ideas exchange would work great but I do not have a large press to do the work suggested. We are planning to implement the idea through one of the members of our NJAQP chapter who has the press to do the work. We plan to ask other chapter members if they would like to be part of the marketing idea and will run a larger volume for other interested shops.
  5. I learned of an interesting plan for prepaying the first half of a loan which would reduce the amount of interest paid and put more into paying off the principle.
  6. I talked with other printers about the types of testing they use in their shop for job applicants.
  7. The New England Chapter chair who owns a print shop in New Haven, CT knows my son is attending college in New Haven after working for us in our shop for almost 4 years. She is looking for someone to do some computer work for her or for the chapter and wants my son to contact her about the part-time work. And if he is not interested, he can give her some suggestions of other students who might be interested.
This information plus the trip, hotel seminars, tapes, etc. cost less than $1000 so I thing I got my money s worth. I suggest looking into other options like Crouser Performance Groups, NAQP, Chicagoland Chapter, etc. before making a commitment to sign up with a franchise. The trail is happy although a little cold and snowy these days. Carol Clark Subj: Independent to Franchise
From: earl@cdsnet.net (Earl Eyre)
To: TomCrouser@aol.com


What a hit! You must have had more response than normal--that or we were more verbose. Considering the wide range of responses, I think it would be interesting to hear what your response to that printer was. Are you game for adding your opinion? Earl

T-O-M- -S O-P-I-N-I-O-N on Franchises, Independents and The State of Nature

Well, Earl caught me, didn t he. Of all the messages I have issued, this message from the independent considering the franchise seems to have sustained the most fervent feelings. It also brings up the grass is browner syndrome which is the flip side of the grass is greener.

I have often remarked to anyone who would listen that when this subject comes up at independent printing meetings, the comments often are, Those poor lost franchise mom and pops who don t know enough to do business for themselves. At franchise meetings, I often hear franchisees (this specific one was doing several million) say, Those poor mom and pop independents. They don t know enough to get good prices or market a product.

Well, here is my response to each of the questions posed by Chicagoland printer.
  1. To help me find good workers. It is true I have to find the employees, but once I find them, they can help me screen, evaluate, train and keep those employees.
    Franchises and independents both do an equally bad job in this area. Both use selection tools with the same infrequency, relying instead on intuition and the ability for the owner to size up the person. Once employed, workers are rarely evaluated, never trained and kept uninformed on an equal basis. I see no overall advantage to the franchise on this issue, although the franchisor typically will have an edge in knowing the tools to use. However, the same tools and instruments are available to the independent. The franchise may have a more active training program, but the independent can also find worker training. Neither the franchisee nor the independent truly use worker training to a great extent.
  2. Measure the output and performance of these employees. I do not see an advantage to either franchise or independent on this issue. Importantly, I don t even think this is the question. It is not the measurement of output of workers which is the issue. Many shops bog down from the sheer weight of measurements without providing the necessary production leadership. It s leadership, not measurement which is the key, in my opinion.
  3. Provide name recognition. I have lost customers to Alphagraphics and Insty-Prints and do not know how to go back and retrieve these customers.
    All printing is local. Name recognition on a national scale rarely does any good for the local printer. Now, I didn t say name recognition didn t do any good. Only, national name recognition. Pretty Fast Printing has, in your community, the same opportunity for name recognition as any of the major franchises. Customers do business with people who solve their problems regardless of franchise. Now, during a start-up, the package of name, look, signs and advertising typically provides the franchisee with a better start than what I have seen typically among independents. After years of operation within a community, changing the name of Chicagoland printer s shop would be of little benefit.

    As an aside, I was interested in the number of replies we had of franchisees who had to live DOWN the name recognition provided by previous franchisees of the same company.

    However, that said, this is the one area where franchisors do have an ability to improve upon their product offerings. I m not sure we have seen it yet within our industry, a la McDonald s or Ford, but some franchisors are trying hard and having some success.
  4. Provide assistance with established systems: accounting, billing, job filing, credit and collection policies. Systems of accounting, billing, job filing, credit and collection not only are available to independents, accounting is accounting. Accounts receivable are accounts receivable. If one has been in business for a number of years and not yet solved these problems, it is problematical that a franchise will solve them. Once again, upon start-up, the franchisee probably has a faster time in implementing adequate systems only because they don t have to reinvent the wheel. However, it is my experience that most printers, franchise or not, desires to reinvent the wheel in their own image. Again, no particular advantage to you over what is otherwise available.
  5. Equipment purchases. Our purchase of a Xerox 5065 was a disaster. I am still fighting with Xerox. 6.) With a major franchise, maybe Xerox will pay more attention. Besides they can make a more attractive pricing deal with the major companies. 7.) Help in buying equipment. Besides getting a better deal they know what makes money and what does not.

    Franchises can, from time to time, provide some good deals, but so can NAQP and others. Franchisors have more success in assisting their franchisees with financing the equipment, however and from that standpoint they have an edge. They also tend to have some edge in securing an initial package of equipment. Unfortunately, some franchisors have vested interests in getting you to purchase certain equipment, etc. which, in my opinion, nullifies the advantage many times.

    As for specific equipment, a franchisee is subject to the same pressure as an independent in buying equipment. And, as much as the industry loves to hate suppliers like Xerox, we also must remember that we also make a lot of money at the same time from their inventions. If one adds up all the pluses and minuses, we are much better off with them than without them. So, some deals go bad but the vast majority are good.

    That said, the franchise does has some advantage in assisting with resolving disputes with some vendors, but I m not sure they have an inordinate amount of power versus NAQP or other trade associations. That is because I believe companies making markets within our industry are concerned about all customer relations, not just those with franchise companies.
Enough of the specific questions. What wasn t asked was what was picked up on by franchisees and independents alike. Chicagoland was asking for someone to come in and do his job for him.

Walt Francis, a Minuteman franchisee from Chatham, New Jersey put it very eloquently when he said, We are the third owner of a Minuteman Franchise. The first one locked the doors after 3 months. The second one survived 11 months and broke even. After we bought from the 2nd owner, he wrote a letter to the franchise with a copy to us which stated, This location will never support a printer. You are doing a disservice to anyone who buys this location. Obviously we were not impressed with his opinion after the fact. We have now been operating the place for over 17 years and talk with many other printers. I have seen franchise and independent shops fail. Success depends more on the owner than the name on the front of the place.

A franchise can not take the place of the leader. NAQP can not take the place of the leader. Chicagoland realizes this and has said as much in subsequent correspondence.

I d like to add a footnote. Franchises are first and foremost, a marketing organization. They can do many things in marketing and sales if, and only if, the franchisees support their efforts. Generally, this conformity to standards must be enforced through contractual arrangements. Can you image a McDonald s franchise who has decided not to do breakfasts? How about a Ford dealer who doesn t want to sell Escorts?

A trade association is not a franchise. Regardless of how good a trade association is, a trade association is a trade association dedicated to assisting all participants in an industry. Your competitor can join just as you did. Rarely does a consumer buy from a specific trade association member because they are members of the state restaurant association. That is not to say that trade associations are not also good.

Franchises who transcend the get them in business approach and who offer products and services to customers through a network of franchisees are doing an excellent job for their members and are most successful. Sir Speedy, in my opinion, has done a good job of this. Trade associations who offer products and real services to their members do an excellent job. NAQP, in my opinion, is a good example of this. But trade associations are not franchises and franchises are not trade associations. They exist for different purposes and different results. That s why so many franchisees belong to trade associations and get good results from both.

Happy Trails. Tom Crouser

BACK ISSUES May Be Found at the National Association of Quick Printer s America On Line Site (keyword: NAQP, publications, Crouser Report) or on the internet at the PrintUSA web site (http://printusa.com/articles/crouser.htm) or on PrinterNet. Hey, do we get around or what?

Crouser & Associates - Helping Printers Prosper Since 1985

Crouser & Associates Performance Group program includes two on-site evaluations by Tom Crouser each year along with two group meetings. Management training is held during the group meetings along with participation in a meeting with non-competing printers. Join others who have decided to run their business instead of the business running them. Reply to by Email to Tom Crouser for more detailed information or call Clark Workman at (304) 342-5100. Or fax (304) 342-5187 or contact crouser@ibm.net.

Return to Crouser Index at http://www.printusa.com/articles/crouser.htm

Date inserted: Friday, March 15, 1996 12:38:12 PM Return to PrintUSA home page WWW at http://www.printusa.com.