Crouser & Associates Performance Group program helps printers prosper through
on-site assistance and twice yearly group meetings. For more information by
Email or call (304) 342-5100. Crouser Report OnLine is the
Copyright
Thomas P. Crouser. Material may not be reproduced in whole or in part without written
consent. Current reports are on the WWW at http://www.printusa.com.
Independent To Franchise? Opinions Part III
Crouser Report OnLine March 13, 1996
Transmitted from Orlando, Florida
Tom Crouser presents
Power Pricing
in NEW ORLEANS on Saturday, March 23rd
for the Gulf Coast Association of Quick Printers. For meeting information,
message Gator4Fun@aol.com. Visitations: two on-site visitation dates are
available in the south in April along with one in Colorado in May. Other
appointments are being accepted for September and later. Reply to me for more
details.
In this edition of the independent to franchise question, I offer four
letters from you on the subject as well as my own opinion. Here s the latest:
From: Hotline Cy
To: TomCrouser
You write:
Our purchase of a Xerox 5065 was a disaster. I am still
fighting with Xerox. 6. With a major franchise, maybe Xerox will pay more
attention. Besides they can make a more attractive pricing deal with the
major companies.
As I started reading this newsletter I couldn t wait to offer my response.
However by the time I had completed reading it virtually everything I wanted
to say had been said. I will limit my response to two areas. First, next to
my outsourcing software my Xerox 5065 (and later 5365) were the absolute best
single item investments I have made since I entered the printing business.
The Xerox was my first mid-range copier, was reasonably reliable, was
superbly serviced by Xerox, and moved almost 40% of the B/W 8.5-11x17 work
off my Ryobi 3200.
As for the second area - I fully concur that NAQP (and intercourse with other
members) is an excellent and economically feasible alternative to franchise
affiliation in most cases. An independent of five or so years who elects to
affiliate with a franchise would appear to have not taken advantage of the
other resources that were available to him. I would think that one could buy
a lot of John Stewart s or Tom Crouser s time for the initial franchise fee
and John and Tom don t require a monthly percentage of your gross for as long
as you are in business.
Very good input from your followers. Sorry I couldn t get to Dallas for your
confab. Glad to hear it went well. (Joe) Polonko is a heavyweight and the
best thing that has happened to Texas printers in many years. cy
Subj: Franchise, NOT!
From: JeroldS1
To: TomCrouser
As a former franchise owner, there is not much I could say on the positive
side, so don t ask. One thing that I think is important are amount of new
store sales and resale of existing stores. Also average amount of years in
business in both cases. Jerold S1
Subj: Franchises
From: JeffAtGPA
To: TomCrouser
In talking about support available from franchises, none of your responders
mentioned one option - Tom Crouser! Most of the things your prospective
franchisee is looking for are benefits gained by joining one of your
performance groups (although I don t think your name recognition helps with
our customers).
You, Pamela and the other members of our performance group have helped us to
hire and train people, to get our accounting in order (some day it will
happen), to buy effectively, and much of the other services he is looking
for. The networking opportunities in a performance group are tremendous, and
I know the seven other printers in the group are more than willing to help me
out with advice. The performance group system isn t cheap, but it s a bargain
compared to franchises!
Subj: Independent vs. Franchise
From: Bpcf
To: TomCrouser
Dear Tom, Now that I m back from the NAQP Owner s Conference full on new
ideas and beads, I have a few thoughts regarding the Chicago shop owner who
is considering a switch to join a franchise. Since we are not a franchise
shop, only know what I hear from other shop owners - both franchise &
independent owners. Some franchise owners get more help than others, but
most of the responsibility still rest with the owner who cannot be passive
and expect the answers to come from others. There is no simple recipe or
formula to follow. If there were we d all be rich.
If a shop had say, $400,000.00 in sales per year, then $20,000 to $40,000
would have to go to the franchise for royalties. Imagine what a shop owner
could do with that kind of money. You could belong to several printing associations like NAQP,
Chicagoland Chapter of NAQP, NAPL, etc. plus attend their programs as well
as bring your employees to the programs. You could have even gone to New
Orleans for 4 days and attend some great seminars, network with other printers, eat
some fantastic food, and catch a few beads.
The NAQP seminars on hiring and motivating employees were pack with valuable
information and hand-outs. The sessions were also taped, in case one could
not attend or would want to review the information.
Among the valuable information I learned while networking with other
printers:
- A group of Denver lawyers have started a class-action suit against
Xerox regarding the 5065. I intend for find out if I can offer any
helpful information.
- Although we had Xerox switch out our 5065, it is still running
into the same problems as our other machine. These problems are indicative of
the model and others have the same problems.
- I got some valuable information about pricing desk-top publishing jobs and how to market design work.
- One of the winning ideas in the ideas exchange would work great
but I do not have a large press to do the work suggested. We are
planning to implement the idea through one of the members of our NJAQP
chapter who has the press to do the work. We plan to ask other chapter
members if they would like to be part of the marketing idea and will
run a larger volume for other interested shops.
- I learned of an interesting plan for prepaying the first half
of a loan which would reduce the amount of interest paid and put more into paying
off the principle.
- I talked with other printers about the types of testing they
use in their shop for job applicants.
- The New England Chapter chair who owns a print shop in New
Haven, CT knows my son is attending college in New Haven after
working for us in our shop for almost 4 years. She is looking for someone to do
some computer work for her or for the chapter and wants my son to contact
her about the part-time work. And if he is not interested, he can give
her some suggestions of other students who might be interested.
This information plus the trip, hotel seminars, tapes, etc. cost less than
$1000 so I thing I got my money s worth. I suggest looking into other options
like Crouser Performance Groups, NAQP, Chicagoland Chapter, etc. before making
a commitment to sign up with a franchise. The trail is happy although a
little cold and snowy these days. Carol Clark
Subj: Independent to Franchise
From: earl@cdsnet.net (Earl Eyre)
To: TomCrouser@aol.com
What a hit! You must have had more response than normal--that or we were
more verbose. Considering the wide range of responses, I think it would be
interesting to hear what your response to that printer was. Are you game for
adding your opinion? Earl
T-O-M- -S O-P-I-N-I-O-N on Franchises, Independents and The State of Nature
Well, Earl caught me, didn t he. Of all the messages I have issued, this
message from the independent considering the franchise seems to have
sustained the most fervent feelings. It also brings up the grass is browner
syndrome which is the flip side of the grass is greener.
I have often remarked to anyone who would listen that when this subject comes
up at independent printing meetings, the comments often are,
Those poor lost
franchise mom and pops who don t know enough to do business for themselves.
At franchise meetings, I often hear franchisees (this specific one was doing
several million) say,
Those poor mom and pop independents. They don t know
enough to get good prices or market a product.
Well, here is my response to each of the questions posed by Chicagoland
printer.
- To help me find good workers. It is true I have to find the employees,
but once I find them, they can help me screen, evaluate, train and keep those
employees.
Franchises and independents both do an equally bad job in this area. Both use
selection tools with the same infrequency, relying instead on intuition and
the ability for the owner to
size up the person.
Once employed, workers are
rarely evaluated, never trained and kept uninformed on an equal basis. I see
no overall advantage to the franchise on this issue, although the franchisor
typically will have an edge in knowing the tools to use. However, the same
tools and instruments are available to the independent. The franchise may
have a more active training program, but the independent can also find worker
training. Neither the franchisee nor the independent truly use worker
training to a great extent.
- Measure the output and performance of these employees.
I do not see an advantage to either franchise or independent on this issue.
Importantly, I don t even think this is the question. It is not the
measurement of output of workers which is the issue. Many shops bog down from
the sheer weight of measurements without providing the necessary production
leadership. It s leadership, not measurement which is the key, in my opinion.
- Provide name recognition. I have lost customers to Alphagraphics and
Insty-Prints and do not know how to go back and retrieve these customers.
All printing is local. Name recognition on a national scale rarely does any
good for the local printer. Now, I didn t say name recognition didn t do any
good. Only, national name recognition. Pretty Fast Printing has, in your
community, the same opportunity for name recognition as any of the major
franchises. Customers do business with people who solve their problems
regardless of franchise. Now, during a start-up, the package of name, look,
signs and advertising typically provides the franchisee with a better start
than what I have seen typically among independents. After years of operation
within a community, changing the name of Chicagoland printer s shop would be
of little benefit.
As an aside, I was interested in the number of replies we had of franchisees
who had to live DOWN the name recognition provided by previous franchisees of
the same company.
However, that said, this is the one area where franchisors do have an ability
to improve upon their product offerings. I m not sure we have seen it yet
within our industry, a la McDonald s or Ford, but some franchisors are trying
hard and having some success.
- Provide assistance with established systems: accounting, billing, job
filing, credit and collection policies.
Systems of accounting, billing, job filing, credit and collection not only
are available to independents, accounting is accounting. Accounts receivable
are accounts receivable. If one has been in business for a number of years
and not yet solved these problems, it is problematical that a franchise will
solve them. Once again, upon start-up, the franchisee probably has a faster
time in implementing adequate systems only because they don t have to
reinvent the wheel. However, it is my experience that most printers,
franchise or not, desires to reinvent the wheel in their own image. Again, no
particular advantage to you over what is otherwise available.
- Equipment purchases. Our purchase of a Xerox 5065 was a disaster. I am
still fighting with Xerox. 6.) With a major franchise, maybe Xerox will pay
more attention. Besides they can make a more attractive pricing deal with the
major companies. 7.) Help in buying equipment. Besides getting a better deal
they know what makes money and what does not.
Franchises can, from time to time, provide some good deals, but so can NAQP
and others. Franchisors have more success in assisting their franchisees with
financing the equipment, however and from that standpoint they have an edge.
They also tend to have some edge in securing an initial package of equipment.
Unfortunately, some franchisors have vested interests in getting you to
purchase certain equipment, etc. which, in my opinion, nullifies the
advantage many times.
As for specific equipment, a franchisee is subject to the same pressure as an
independent in buying equipment. And, as much as the industry loves to hate
suppliers like Xerox, we also must remember that we also make a lot of money
at the same time from their inventions. If one adds up all the pluses and
minuses, we are much better off with them than without them. So, some deals
go bad but the vast majority are good.
That said, the franchise does has some advantage in assisting with resolving
disputes with some vendors, but I m not sure they have an inordinate amount
of power versus NAQP or other trade associations. That is because I believe
companies making markets within our industry are concerned about all customer
relations, not just those with franchise companies.
Enough of the specific questions. What wasn t asked was what was picked up on
by franchisees and independents alike. Chicagoland was asking for someone to
come in and do his job for him.
Walt Francis, a Minuteman franchisee from Chatham, New Jersey put it very
eloquently when he said,
We are the third owner of a Minuteman Franchise.
The first one locked the doors after 3 months. The second one survived 11
months and broke even. After we bought from the 2nd owner, he wrote a letter
to the franchise with a copy to us which stated, This location will never
support a printer. You are doing a disservice to anyone who buys this
location. Obviously we were not impressed with his opinion after the fact.
We have now been operating the place for over 17 years and talk with many
other printers. I have seen franchise and independent shops fail. Success
depends more on the owner than the name on the front of the place.
A franchise can not take the place of the leader. NAQP can not take the place
of the leader. Chicagoland realizes this and has said as much in subsequent
correspondence.
I d like to add a footnote. Franchises are first and foremost, a marketing
organization. They can do many things in marketing and sales if, and only if,
the franchisees support their efforts. Generally, this conformity to
standards must be enforced through contractual arrangements. Can you image a
McDonald s franchise who has decided not to do breakfasts? How about a Ford
dealer who doesn t want to sell Escorts?
A trade association is not a franchise. Regardless of how good a trade
association is, a trade association is a trade association dedicated to
assisting all participants in an industry. Your competitor can join just as
you did. Rarely does a consumer buy from a specific trade association member
because they are members of the state restaurant association. That is not to
say that trade associations are not also good.
Franchises who transcend the
get them in business
approach and who offer
products and services to customers through a network of franchisees are doing
an excellent job for their members and are most successful. Sir Speedy, in my
opinion, has done a good job of this. Trade associations who offer products
and real services to their members do an excellent job. NAQP, in my opinion,
is a good example of this. But trade associations are not franchises and
franchises are not trade associations. They exist for different purposes and
different results. That s why so many franchisees belong to trade
associations and get good results from both.
Happy Trails. Tom Crouser
BACK ISSUES May Be Found at the National Association of Quick Printer s
America On Line Site (keyword: NAQP, publications, Crouser Report) or on the
internet at the PrintUSA web site (http://printusa.com/articles/crouser.htm)
or on PrinterNet. Hey, do we get around or what?
Crouser & Associates - Helping Printers Prosper Since 1985
Crouser & Associates Performance Group program includes two on-site evaluations
by Tom Crouser each year along with two group meetings. Management training is held during the group
meetings along with participation in a meeting with non-competing printers. Join others who have decided
to run their business instead of the business running them. Reply to by Email to
Tom Crouser for more detailed information or call Clark Workman
at (304) 342-5100. Or fax (304) 342-5187 or contact crouser@ibm.net.
Return to Crouser Index at http://www.printusa.com/articles/crouser.htm
Date inserted: Friday, March 15, 1996 12:38:12 PM
Return to PrintUSA home page WWW at http://www.printusa.com.